✅ Use non superuser token and add perftest for objecttype filter#690
Merged
✅ Use non superuser token and add perftest for objecttype filter#690
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #690 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 83.16% 83.16%
=======================================
Files 128 128
Lines 2429 2429
Branches 193 193
=======================================
Hits 2020 2020
Misses 369 369
Partials 40 40 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Contributor
Bencher Report
danielmursa-dev
approved these changes
Oct 24, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I slightly modified the performance tests in #678, making them use non superuser tokens, which increases the response times in the performance tests. I'm putting it in a separate PR to show that #678 does actually improve performance, compared to main